View Full Version : 3D? no 4D!
megale3
05-24-2007, 05:01 PM
I use CAD all the time to draw things that will have a volume and weight but this model is so complexed I can't imagine all the things you can do with it. :shock:
http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/nm/20070524/2007_05_23t184324_450x402_us_virtual_human.jpg
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/virtual_human_dc
joyofspin
05-25-2007, 10:22 AM
All I can say is wow. How cool is this in theory and how wonderful this could be to help many people.
Can't they be combined into a 34D? I find that very helpful also.
megale3
05-25-2007, 12:21 PM
Can't they be combined into a 34D? I find that very helpful also.
I tried but it came out as a 34 double "D" and that is way more than the sport size I need :P
Well...some of us like to play with all size equipment, including the letters beyond D, DD or even DDD.
megale3
05-25-2007, 12:38 PM
Well...some of us like to play with all size equipment, including the letters beyond D, DD or even DDD.
Just to make clear we are not talking about batteries :P :P
Not with the sports I play.
megale3
05-25-2007, 12:53 PM
Not with the sports I play.
Don't chip a tooth :P :D Dentistry is pretty exspensive these days!
Suffocation would appear to be more likely.
megale3
05-25-2007, 03:22 PM
Suffocation would appear to be more likely.
Damn that is a hazard to the sport- kind of like bonking. Would that be a true anaerobic effort?
M
Suffocation would appear to be more likely.
Damn that is a hazard to the sport- kind of like bonking. Would that be a true anaerobic effort?
M
I'm not interested in whether there is a sports anatony issue...if I go out that way, I go out with a smile...so whatever my HRM says...who cares?
BTW...if you note...not another pervert chimes in here. :twisted:
megale3
05-25-2007, 03:34 PM
There are others we have just got to weed them out of their closet attitudes :oops: Also at least I am trying to keep it somewhat related to the physical activity and yet we still have not talked about the group excersice science to this topic either.
8) Meg
joyofspin
05-26-2007, 10:35 PM
See this is why I only teach IC.
like2bike
05-26-2007, 11:25 PM
See this is why I only teach IC.
Joy is that IC or ICDDD? :shock:
Moonsavvy
05-27-2007, 03:32 AM
And I'm perfectly content with my 34 B's or C's depending on the equipment. 8)
Moonsavvy
05-27-2007, 03:34 AM
Not with the sports I play.
Don't chip a tooth :P :
ummmm do I dare ask?
And I'm perfectly content with my 34 B's or C's depending on the equipment. 8)
Hmmm...very good software applications.
joyofspin
05-29-2007, 01:17 PM
Joy is that IC or ICDDD? :shock:
LOL - take it maybe not so many Ds but you get the point
Moonsavvy
05-29-2007, 08:44 PM
And I'm perfectly content with my 34 B's or C's depending on the equipment. 8)
Hmmm...very good software applications.
It's amazing what you can do with today's technology.
spinguru
05-31-2007, 04:52 PM
Okay, now I've gotta stop, I'm laughing so loud I'm starting to annoy my office mates......
vBulletin® v3.6.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.